Unless you’re ready to incur my wrath and get a strongly worded chapter in my book about you, babyboy.
But its ok. When you confront me i’ll cower and retract my criticisms.
-
- Mr. Tomlinson's feud started after members of the now-defunct Reddit site r/opieandanthony got his Twitter account suspended, causing him to threaten some bored trolls who never heard of him with a libel lawsuit. The trolls responded predictably.
- Mr. Tomlinson has been instructed many times by friends, family, police, and attorneys to stop engaging with his trolls, and that continuing to provoke them will cause him to be trolled even more. Mr. Tomlinson wilfully ignores this advice
- He would eventually file a defamation suit against 60 anonymous people which was dismissed with Mr. Tomlinson being ordered to pay $34,762.25 for opposing parties' attorney fees.
- He ended up paying $83,736.99 due to his unsuccessful attempts to dodge the court-ordered judgement, for which he faced jail time and contempt charges.
- He also filed 2 frivolous restraining orders against people who had engaged in First Amendment-protected behavior (one for texting him and another for attending his contempt of court hearing), both of which were dismissed.
- Early on in the lawsuit, Mr. Tomlinson vandalized his own motorcycle and submitted a false police report blaming the people he was suing.
- He accidentally sent surveillance video of the alleged vandal (himself) to a troll.
- Mr. Tomlinson has never shown this video footage during any of his media tours, and desperately tries to scrub it from the internet.
- Mr. Tomlinson claims that the surveillance video was initiated by his "motion-activated" camera, which only collects "30 seconds at a time", despite the video being 32 seconds long and beginning several seconds before the "vandal" enters into the frame.
- On 13 April 2023, the individual responsible for calling the fake emergencies (SWATs) to Mr. Tomlinson's house, a SWAT-for-hire dealer named "Torswats", revealed that Mr. Tomlinson ordered the SWATs to his own house because he wanted to get in the news and sue the MPD for money.
- Torswats would repeat these allegations in private chats which were not intended for public view.
- Mr. Tomlinson has gone on multiple news tours since the SWATtings started in order to promote his victimhood brand, utilizing the services of Lenora Claire.
- He also recently sued the MPD for money.
-
Reminder: Do not call, text, or mention harrassing someone in real life. Do not encourage it. Do not talk about killing or using violence against anyone, or engaging in any criminal behavior. If it is not an obvious joke even when taken out of context, don't post it. Please report violators.
DMCA, complaints, and other inquiries:
[email protected]
The Pink Panther is comedic genius that is not to be altered.
- Thread starter Sue Lightning
- Start date
Unless you’re ready to incur my wrath and get a strongly worded chapter in my book about you, babyboy.
But its ok. When you confront me i’ll cower and retract my criticisms.
Nort-tone would have redone that movie for 5% of what Martin was offered. He probably made 10 mill and Jim would have defended himself doing it for 500k. Also I never saw the original but I’m sure it’s no masterpiece. I wonder if they did the pretending to walk down stairs on flat ground gag.
The world has definitely determined that Steve Martin has nothing on comedy legend Jim Norton.
Being there was better anyways
Sellers was the only Clouseau and Kevin Kline isnt worthy of licking Herbert Lom’s shit covered boots but its not like Steve Martin’s the first person to try and take over the role.
The Pink Panther movies are like Monty Python, one or two clips are hilarious but fuck watching an two hours of that
The Pink Panther movies are like Monty Python, one or two clips are hilarious but fuck watching an two hours of that
Me neither but its a fucking cartoon. It’s like defending the artistic integrity of Mr. Bean…WHO GIVES A FUCK. ITS FOR KIDS.
So what you’re saying is its an unreasonable reaction to fly into a rage, spitting on the floor, and insulting a more famous actor than you, wishing AIDS on him, because he did a shitty adaptation of a shitty cartoon?
No, I’m saying Steve Martins an unfunny cunt but this was Norton trying to be a comedy snob once again and show how “educated “ he is because he’s a fan of Peter Sellers. And they tried to have other people play Clouseau before Steve Martin, its just his movies are really fucking unfunny and cringey
G
guest
Guest
It won’t influence any comedy.
No, the films started in the 63 , the shitty cheap cartoons were 70s
The original isn't even that good.
A Shot in the Dark, the first sequel and the ONLY one not bearing the Pink Panther name, is excellent and should be required viewing.
No need to alter either the “funny” Chip character from da show into a shitty cartoon that makes Drawn Together look like King of the Hill.
Steve Martin is not married too a man. Jim should never criticize anyone, ever again
Jim would have done it for free if the D-listers they had co-staring with him would have signed whatever bullshit he asked.
It is, Peter sellers is the man but Norton's fake conviction was so forced. He's a fake and I don't like him
Steve Martin: fucks biological women, made numerous popular films, enjoys a specific musical genre to the point where he learned to play it and actively participate in it. Jim Norton: gets fucked up the ass by a contrived, affected shemale, likes two bands, buys shitty merch to "support" them. Essentially, you have an actual man, and a depraved sex pervert who grovels for bit roles in awful movies.
I saw Steve Martin in 2008 in the Museum of Fine Arts when he was in Boston filming one of these Pink Panther movies. He had that stupid mustache. I said to my girlfriend at the time "Hey that's Steve Martin" and he frowned at me. Seems like a pretty good guy compared to Jim Norton based on that.
Last edited:
I loved the originals as a kid. I've really got nothing more to add. Punching out.