• Recently, onaforums has taken to opening a substack. You can subscribe to this substack to get email notifications when the site is down, gets a new domain name, or is otherwise running into trouble. We are not accepting donations at this time, so please skip the part where it asks if you would like to contribute. Subscribe at onaforums.substack.com

  • Reminder: Do not call, text, or mention harrassing someone in real life. Do not encourage it. Do not talk about killing or using violence against anyone, or engaging in any criminal behavior. If it is not an obvious joke even when taken out of context, don't post it. Please report violators. If you want your account deleted, send a private message to @BlackTransLivesMatter

    Do not post IRL pranks here without including the source

    DMCA, complaints, and other inquiries:

    [email protected]

“Supreme Court makes it harder to prosecute online stlakers“ LA Times

Chive Turkey

Erock Army Desserter
Forum Clout
40,828
Pat doesn't understand that critiquing public commentary and stalking are two very different things.
He does nothing else himself. His whole feed is him shitting on, harassing and threatening public figures. Him and his ilk are hypocrites who just don't like it when someone extends the same courtesy to them. They genuinely believe they have the right to spout off the most vile things imaginable about the people they hate, but anyone who happens to look at them funny should be silenced and thrown in jail.

It's classic narcissism. It's never their fault when they get put in time out for clear ToS violations, it's always the trolls gaming the system somehow. Also it's suddenly perfectly okay to mass report people when they do it.
 

DoctorSteveCarlisi

Butterknife recipient
Forum Clout
32,818
From the article:

“We’re glad the Supreme Court affirmed today that inadvertently threatening speech cannot be criminalized,” said Brian Hauss, senior staff attorney with the ACLU’s Speech, Privacy, & Technology Project. “In a world rife with misunderstandings and miscommunications, people would be chilled from speaking altogether if they could be jailed for failing to predict how their words would be received. The 1st Amendment provides essential breathing room for public debate by requiring the government to demonstrate that the defendant acted intentionally or recklessly.”
 

Jenna

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9cMIarrxLGs
Forum Clout
67,777
sigh.jpg


:(:(:(

I'm so sorry, Rick.
 
Top