16 days later. Gee, I wonder if he was looking at Paul's timeline, or Mr. Munoz's...
He pays more attention to us than his own friends.
He pays more attention to us than his own friends.
-
- Mr. Tomlinson's feud started after members of the now-defunct Reddit site r/opieandanthony got his Twitter account suspended, causing him to threaten some bored trolls who never heard of him with a libel lawsuit. The trolls responded predictably.
- Mr. Tomlinson has been instructed many times by friends, family, police, and attorneys to stop engaging with his trolls, and that continuing to provoke them will cause him to be trolled even more. Mr. Tomlinson wilfully ignores this advice.
- He would eventually file a defamation suit against 60 anonymous people which was dismissed with Mr. Tomlinson being ordered to pay $34,762.25 for opposing parties' attorney fees.
- He ended up paying $83,736.99 due to his unsuccessful attempts to dodge the court-ordered judgement, for which he faced jail time and contempt charges.
- He also filed 2 frivolous restraining orders against people who had engaged in First Amendment-protected behavior (one for texting him and another for attending his contempt of court hearing), both of which were dismissed.
- Early on in the lawsuit, Mr. Tomlinson vandalized his own motorcycle and submitted a false police report blaming the people he was suing.
- He accidentally sent surveillance video of the alleged vandal to a troll. The individual in the video is very obviously Patrick S. Tomlinson.
- Mr. Tomlinson has never submitted this video footage during any of his many media tours, and desperately tries to scrub it from the internet.
- Mr. Tomlinson claims that the surveillance video was initiated by his "motion-activated" camera, which only collects "30 seconds at a time", despite the video being 32 seconds long and beginning several seconds before the "vandal" enters into the frame.
- On 13 April 2023, the individual responsible for calling the fake emergences (SWATs) to Mr. Tomlinson's house, a SWAT-for-hire dealer named "Torswats", revealed that Mr. Tomlinson ordered the SWATs to his own house because he wanted to get in the news and sue the MPD for money.
- Torswats would repeat these allegations in private chats which were not intended for public view.
- Mr. Tomlinson has gone on multiple news tours since the SWATtings started in order to promote his victimhood brand, utilizing the services of Lenora Claire.
- He also recently sued the MPD for money.
Rick rushes to the aid of uncle paul
- Thread starter Steroid Maximus
- Start date
Oh yeah? Well, Rick says that making KP is always appropriate. Stop being such a Nazi.
How the fuck can he say Paul " never has " ? The proof came from his own gallery. it wasnt like a cryberstalker report and block photoshopped this shit. I hate you Patrick S Tomlinson, and it is 100% your fault paul got exposed.
Just one more of Rick's technicalities. Since he's in the SWFA he doesn't consider KP inappropriate
Last edited:
Some Nazi incel tried to lecture Paul about the age of consent. Paul just laughed because he never bothers with consent.
Fat Milwaukee slob advocates for middle aged man's right to photograph other people's kids bathing in the nude.
Not surprising that a man who can't legally be near his daughter would have this kind of troubling opinion.
Not surprising that a man who can't legally be near his daughter would have this kind of troubling opinion.
Last edited:
P
potatopeeler63
Guest
Ohhhhh LADY LAWDY stop y'alls bickerin and try summa my sweet sweet succulent pat rib sauce... guaranteed to make y'all want ribs every which day of da week or i aint got real hair!
G
guest
Guest
That’s me. I hope brothaman Josiah doesn’t mind me coping his name.
And fuck I’m blocked. Strange that Pat hasn’t blocked me.
And fuck I’m blocked. Strange that Pat hasn’t blocked me.
G
guest
Guest
Yes, fellow atalker he actually did.
You know what? I would.
Yep, in reply to a tweet with a link to the actual photos. Him and fellow pedophile Shaun Duke both defended Paul.
"Photo gallery of a fully-dressed-kid"="single photograph my friend took up that fully-dressed kid's skirt."Yep, in reply to a tweet with a link to the actual photos. Him and fellow pedophile Shaun Duke both defended Paul.
Hey, Pat, if you still wanna sue people for calling you a pedophile, don't forget they'll get to produce tweets like this in court. just keep that in mind.
