• Recently, onaforums has taken to opening a substack. You can subscribe to this substack to get email notifications when the site is down, gets a new domain name, or is otherwise running into trouble. We are not accepting donations at this time, so please skip the part where it asks if you would like to contribute. Subscribe at onaforums.substack.com

  • Reminder: Do not call, text, or mention harrassing someone in real life. Do not encourage it. Do not talk about killing or using violence against anyone, or engaging in any criminal behavior. If it is not an obvious joke even when taken out of context, don't post it. Please report violators. If you want your account deleted, send a private message to @BlackTransLivesMatter

    Do not post IRL pranks here without including the source

    DMCA, complaints, and other inquiries:

    [email protected]

FYI Pat’s Internet friends are as bad as rapists and murderers

RickReternal

I hope people Ouija you tweets after your dead
Forum Clout
50,049
Also, you fat shit, accused rapists and murderers do indeed get to tell their side of the story in a variety of formats, both legal and otherwise. Routinely.

IMG_1319.jpeg
 
G

guest

Guest
Don't they usually do exactly that in, *checks notes* court and even in media interviews? Not only did we get Bundy and Dahmer's side of the story, there's a whole subculture in the Western world that is obsessed with these figures and their motives, to the point everyone knows both of them but hardly anyone knows or care about the victims in any in depth way.
 

SFWA liaison

Heidi Hildeman customer
Forum Clout
113,329
literally yes? how 1.7 can he be? that's a huge portion of true crime content, cases that are unclear and contested and they go through the alibis, evidence for and against suspects

Nobody is doing true crime podcast about "nigger had a drug-induced chimp-out, shot up a gas station, everything is on camera, facts are not contested". that's boring as fuck

should Pat not have a right to reply when the Gibneys come forward to Javier and tell their story of being attacked by him?
 
Last edited:

Faggot Boqposter

The Alawite Assassin
Forum Clout
33,448
To follow his pig logic, the people who tweet/text the woman calling her a skank are the same as the guy who breaks in and rapes her. Even if those people thoroughly denounce the act of rape and the rapist.

He has to have all the “stlakers” be part of one singular conspiracy. He couldn’t possibly fathom that many different people from many different areas of the internet and real life find him either comical, detestable, or both.

Rick until you stop being fun to poke people won’t stop poking you baby girl!
 

DominusOdium

Owner/Operator of Liquor Gallery, Elizabeth NJ
Forum Clout
53,143
The real Patrick is the one in the final Josiah tape. That's what goes on in his head, that's what he tries to conceal and hide behind virtue signaling and faux expertise on every topic ever. The creepy sociopathic voice, the idea that only he is an adult and gets to talk, the infant baby talk and bizarre insistence that nobody else matters, nobody but him should get to speak, nobody has a point or anything to teach or tell him, and in the end only he matters. That's the veil completely off, and that's what he thinks when he interacts with other humans.

Nobody else matters but Patrick. Nobody is smarter than Patrick. Patrick is the only adult in any room he's in, and only he can confer upon you the right to speak, to be correct and to be validated... And only if you both agree with and laud Patrick.
 

Slackjawed Cow

I laugh at them because they're all the same.
Forum Clout
282,820
He’s basically quoting George W Bush at this point

“Either you are with us or you are with the terrorists.”
He loves to use whataboutisms. Pat reached out to that guy to be interviewed. Pat wanted the attention. Pat requesting that Javier not even listen to the other side was a red flag he was hiding something. Javier talks to dan and gets a far more rational interview and the fact pat flipped out about it and still is, just shows pat is trying to hide something and he is isnt an "innocent victim" in this whole thing. Pat hates that.
 

Suetonius

LAUGH.
Forum Clout
119,621
Also, you fat shit, accused rapists and murderers do indeed get to tell their side of the story in a variety of formats, both legal and otherwise. Routinely.

View attachment 148225
Also a major false equivalency. Not just because what he experiences is nowhere near a rape or a murder. Lets say a murder or rape has been inconclusively proven. DNA at the crime scene matched to the accused. The accused confesses to the crime and pleads guilty. Of course at that point theres really no reason to get the murderers “side” because theres nothing to contest; they’re a murderer. The most they get of “their side” is their testimony and closing statement (forgetting the actual word)

But in the case of Patrick this isn’t open and shut. It’s not like there’s conclusive evidence linking Dan or Admin to any crimes. They haven’t confessed to any, never been booked for any, etc. They continue to plead their innocence. So yes in that case of course that side gets to tell their story so someone can figure out what the hell is going on here. And of course it would be the same situation with the previously described murderer if they never confessed and plead not guilty. They would get an alibi / account of where they were on that night, any relation to the victim, their past and if theres any criminal history etc…aka THEIR SIDE OF THE STORY!!

The problem to reiterate it is that Pat is operating on the conclusion that we are already guilty and thus theres nothing to be sorted out
 
Top