Opie and Anthony Reddit Forums

quasi101 · Aug 28, 2023

Richard Stalkins said:
Alright, I had a look at the other quash. It looks like it was dismissed and fees were awarded, and afterwards Quasi's attorneys submitted post-judgement costs. However, about a month after that, the clerk wrote a letter of rejection, saying that the dismissal did not come with a judgement. It appears that Quasi is trying to set aside the dismissal and get a ruling with a judgement. Am I understanding this correctly? How could a judge order attorney fees, but not count that as a judgement? Last bowel movement was in May.

View attachment 145648

View attachment 145649

Looks like Quasi's attorneys made an oopsie doodle. I hope they aren't charging him for this.

View attachment 145650

Am I understanding this correctly? How could a judge order attorney fees, but not count that as a judgement?

If you read the whole thing quasi's attorney lays out where the miscommunication came from.

In civil cases, a minute order can be considered as a sufficient judgment.” (People v. Dobbs (1945) 70 Cal.App.2d 261, 2565.) Counsel believed that a Minute Order may act as a judgment and thus, no judgement was required to be listed under ROA for John Doe 1 to file the Abstract of Judgment.

Mr. Rosenfeld and Mr. Krich both believed that, under People v. Dobbs and similar law, the minute order imposing sanctions for attorney’s fees was sufficient to execute an abstract of judgment.

Sounds like either the attornies fucked up or the court did. According to the document, there's a hearing on 9/14/2023 to discuss it. It's boring procedural stuff seems like, but I-anal.

Reminder: Do not call, text, or mention harrassing someone in real life. Do not encourage it. Do not talk about killing or using violence against anyone, or engaging in any criminal behavior. If it is not an obvious joke even when taken out of context, don't post it. Please report violators.

[email protected]

Opie and Anthony Reddit Forums

quasi101

the $83,736.99 fugitive

Attachments