- Forum Clout
- 83,207
- Deleted by N/A
Are they really going to use his responses to funster taunts as evidence of his financial situation? Am I in some cartoon? Cannot be serious attorneys.
I know you're doing your cf-lite tm bit here (which, I always appreciate), but to be autistic and use you as a prop to move da show along like a bobo call *sniff*. Anyone saying, well they are just tweets to twitter trolls, you're as stupid as Rick. If you tweet you don't owe any debt and there's no exam leading up to the exam, then skip it, that can absolutely be used. Social media posts can certainly be taken into account. It doesn't matter to whom they were sent. This is why you don't talk about shit.
Here's why its Tomlinson level thinking. Statutes, specifically around sanctions, usually have some requirement of good faith to them. Pick an affirmative defense he could use, and then apply logic that requires at least a 2.0 at Wisconsin hick 9th-grade problem-solving.
One of the most common defenses to Contempt would be, for example, the inability to comply. Now he has to also defend the tweets, but you notice the burden shift? Instead of quasi and his lawyers showing he's in contempt the burden is shifted to, "how did you have an inability to comply if you were tweeting for a week up to the exam and made no attempt to reschedule?
Are you saying you couldn't do better than him in problem-solving classes for dummies?